A federal judge declined to impose sanctions on an immigration attorney on Thursday who admitted to using artificial intelligence in a filing that hallucinated a non-existent case citation.
Judge
- Reynolds represents Student Doe, who jointly dismissed his lawsuit against the Trump administration on June 30 after alleging his F-1 visa was unlawfully terminated in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System
- The fictitious citation, Moms Against Poverty v. Department of State, was generated in Reynolds’ June 22 brief to demonstrate that Doe only needed to demonstrate a likelihood of jurisdiction to avoid dismissal
- Reynolds admitted to failing to verify the case and told Mehta that she “deeply regrets” the incident and asked to be spared of sanctions, according to her response brief
The case is Doe v. Noem, D.D.C., No. 1:25-cv-01352, minute order 7/10/25.
Seamus Hughes in Washington also contributed to this story.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
