Protecting Your IP Needs to Keep Pace With Additive Manufacturing

The Bottom Line

• The advancement of additive manufacturing from an experimental tool to a valuable production method increases intellectual property risks.
• Companies can use smart IP strategies to protect brand value and integrate legal protection with digital enforcement.
• Learning to adapt soon will help companies shape the future rather than react to it.

Additive manufacturing, or AM, has evolved to become a defining technology of modern industry. What started as rapid prototyping has become a full-scale production method across aerospace, the automotive sector, health care, consumer products, and beyond.

AM enables companies to design parts with complex internal structures, create lighter assemblies, and produce tools on demand. This agility has shortened product cycles from years to months.

Its promise—speed, customization, and distributed production—has reshaped how companies design, manufacture, and deliver products to market.

But as this technology has advanced, so have the associated intellectual property risks. The features that make AM revolutionary—digital design files, decentralized production, and rapid iteration—make it harder to obtain and enforce this technology’s related IP.

Protecting a product or manufacturing process requires a layered enforcement strategy that combines legal rights, digital safeguards, and proactive risk management.

As innovation accelerates, companies must rethink how IP fits into their business models—or risk watching competitors and infringers leverage the gap between technology and IP protection. These additional IP tools expand the framework needed to protect AM innovation.

Manufacturing Revolution

Once a digital computer-aided design file leaves a company’s secure environment, maintaining control is at risk. CAD files can be copied, modified, and distributed globally in seconds.

Unlike traditional manufacturing, where IP infringement was tied to physical goods and large-scale factories, AM democratizes production. Thousands of small-scale users—from suppliers and contractors to hobbyists—can reproduce designs to create company products.

A single leak can undermine millions of dollars in research and development, reduce the exclusivity of a breakthrough product, or flood markets with unauthorized, and potentially inferior, copies.

Traditional IP frameworks were built for an era of centralized production. Patent law assumed a visible chain of manufacture, where infringement was tangible and traceable.

But AM breaks that assumption. CAD files can now cross jurisdictions and networks invisibly. Enforcement under existing frameworks is complex, time-consuming, and expensive. The disconnect creates an “IP gap,” a growing divide between the pace of technological advancement and the speed of legal adaptation.

This uncertainty surrounding the protection of AM technology and products created using this technology complicates IP valuation, investment, licensing, and risk management.

Patents Reimagined

Patents remain the backbone of AM protection, but they need to evolve. A strong AM patent portfolio extends beyond the product itself; it must include the method of manufacture and any unique features enabled by additive processes. Claims should anticipate distributed production and digital workflows, not just traditional manufacturing capabilities.

Companies should consider including separate claims for both method and article protection. A “method of manufacturing” claim can cover how the object is created through AM, while an “article” claim can cover the finished product, regardless of who prints it. This dual approach ensures enforceability across the supply chain, from service providers printing components to distributors selling finished goods.

Aligning legal strategy with business objectives is just as important. Patent filings should focus on protecting the company’s differentiating technologies that drive revenue, attract investors, and shape competitive advantage.

Enforcement efforts should prioritize commercial infringers and platforms that enable large-scale distribution of infringing designs. Chasing individual prosumers who print small batches of infringing products is inefficient and could damage corporate reputations. Focusing on organized, profit-driven infringers maximizes deterrence while controlling costs.

Beyond the Factory

In an AM world, the digital CAD file is the new blueprint. Protecting it is critical. Copyright law provides a valuable and often overlooked tool for doing so.

By registering key CAD files, companies can treat these digital assets as creative works, giving them additional rights beyond those granted by patents.

Copyright protection enables rapid response to digital infringement. Platforms hosting unauthorized design files can be compelled to remove them through takedown notices, often within days.

Because copyright law allows for statutory damages and attorney’s fees, enforcement becomes economically feasible even when individual infringements are small. This predictability helps address the balance between the need for enforcement and budgetary responsibility.

Brand Protection

Innovation drives new products—but brand identity drives market confidence and valuation. Trademarks and trade dress serve as the front line of that trust, protecting names, logos, and distinctive visual designs that distinguish genuine goods from imitators.

As AM technology enables rapid replication and customization, it heightens the risk of counterfeit or misbranded products bearing a company’s legitimate marks.

Counterfeit goods undermine a company’s brand reputation. But they also can introduce serious safety and quality risks, especially in sectors such as aerospace, medical devices, sporting goods, and industrial components. These infringements blur the line between genuine and unauthorized production, eroding the consumer trust that many brands have built over decades.

Trademark and trade dress laws provide robust remedies to address these challenges. Companies can seek injunctions to stop infringing uses, recover profits from counterfeiters and, in cases of willful infringement, secure enhanced or treble damages. These remedies help preserve brand integrity and complement patents and copyrights by addressing the consumer-facing side of innovation.

Trade dress protection extends beyond words and logos to include the unique look, shape, or configuration of a product or its packaging, provided the design is distinctive and nonfunctional. In a market where AM enables limitless customization, trade dress can be an important differentiator and enforcement tool.

By incorporating brand protection into IP strategy, companies make sure that the appeal of design and reputation is as secure as the technology that creates it.

Trade Secrets

Some innovations in AM are best protected as trade secrets. These may include proprietary processes, specialized material formulations, or confidential software algorithms. When properly protected, trade secrets can provide indefinite protection against misappropriation.

To qualify as trade secrets, companies must take reasonable measures to maintain secrecy. This typically involves confidentiality agreements with employees and contractors, restricted access to sensitive information, and robust security protocols.

Where trade secrets are misappropriated, the law provides for injunctions, damages and, in cases of willful misconduct, exemplary damages. Trade secret protection offers an important layer of protection in a multi-tiered strategy for companies operating in the AM sector.

Reducing Risk

Contracts are among the most practical and adaptable tools for managing innovation for AM companies. Beyond protection, contracts enable growth. Strategic licensing and joint development agreements allow companies to expand into new markets or technologies while retaining ownership of their core innovations.

Well-crafted licensing agreements govern how digital designs, materials, and production methods are shared, used, and monetized. They can limit redistribution, establish clear royalty structures, and define the standards that protect quality and brand reputation for AM companies across the supply chain.

By aligning legal terms with business objectives, contracts transform IP from a legal safeguard into a competitive advantage.

Smart contracts can automate licensing and royalty collection, turning IP management from a reactive task into a proactive revenue model. As AM supply chains become more digital and decentralized, these tools will expand their value as a key component of the next generation of IP compliance.

Technology-Based Safeguards

Technology itself should become part of the enforcement toolkit. Blockchain, digital rights management, and watermarking tools can protect CAD files in ways that traditional legal systems can’t match.

Blockchain provides an immutable ledger of ownership and file transfers, creating verifiable records that can serve as evidence in disputes. Digital rights management systems can restrict how files are shared, viewed, or printed, allowing rights holders to control use in real time.

Watermarking technology, which embeds invisible identifiers into digital files, helps trace leaks and identify the source of unauthorized use. Although no system is foolproof, these technologies increase accountability and transparency.

Combined, they form a technical barrier that discourages unauthorized copying and supports enforcement.

Hybrid Enforcement Strategy

A successful IP strategy should integrate legal protection with digital enforcement. Patents safeguard inventions; copyrights and trade secrets protect designs; and trademarks, trade dress, and contracts govern authorized use and preserve brand value. Layering these protections ensures flexibility.

Leading manufacturers already are using hybrid strategies that merge legal and technical protection. For example, embedding digital rights management in CAD files allows companies to demonstrate control over their assets, strengthening their position in court. Combining that with robust IP protections and contractual terms creates a comprehensive system that’s harder to circumvent.

This approach transforms IP from a defensive mechanism into a growth enabler. With consistent, cross-functional IP integration, companies can pursue partnerships, licensing, and market expansion with greater confidence.

Business Implications

Cost control remains a central concern for any enforcement program. Fortunately, technology-based protections and focused legal strategies can reduce the burden. By prioritizing high-impact cases, automating takedown processes, and relying on digital safeguards, companies can protect their IP portfolios without draining resources.

From a reputational standpoint, visible IP management builds trust. Customers, investors, and partners want assurance that a company can protect what it creates. A proactive IP stance signals maturity, professionalism, and confidence—qualities that differentiate leaders from followers in a fast-moving industry.

AM is redefining global production, and IP protection must evolve with it. While legislation and case law will continue to adapt, companies that act now will be positioned to shape the future rather than react to it. AM’s next phase will be defined by those that integrate IP thinking into every stage of production.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law, Bloomberg Tax, and Bloomberg Government, or its owners.

Author Information

J. Rick Taché is a partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw & Pitman and advises companies on global intellectual property strategy, enforcement, and portfolio development.

Write for Us: Author Guidelines