Attorneys for an investment services company didn’t engage in malpractice by supposedly allowing its principal manager/owner to misappropriate clients’ funds and by failing to report his wrongdoing to government officials, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided Oct. 5 (Hays v. Page Perry, LLC, 2015 BL 327426, 11th Cir., 15-11506, 10/5/15, unpublished, aff’g
The court’s nonprecedential per curiam order affirms a district court’s conclusion there was no plausible inference from the plaintiff’s allegations that the lawyers knew of the owner/manager’s theft or that they violated their legal ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.