Shenzen Sanlida Electrical Co. argued its assets were wrongly frozen without it having been properly served Whirlpool’s complaint. The high court has previously held that a court can freeze property “once personal jurisdiction of a party is obtained,” but mere notice of the suit doesn’t suffice to establish jurisdiction, it argued.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling was “dangerous,” Shenzen Sanlida told justices, because it ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.