Shenzhen Sanlida Electrical Technology Co. Ltd. needed to be merely on notice and not served for the court to have authority to grant a preliminary injunction, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said in a Friday opinion. The court also rejected Shenzhen’s argument that injunction factors like likelihood of success on the merits weighed against barring sales during the litigation.
The Fifth Circuit’s precedential ruling stressed that its 1978 precedent ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.