The federal government urged a judge to reject
Gilead’s April 17 motion suggested the judgment could be misinterpreted as holding the company liable for direct infringement. The government’s opposition, filed Wednesday in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, said such “speculation regarding a potential misinterpretation does not constitute the clear error of law or demonstrate the need to prevent manifest injustice that is required to grant” Gilead’s request ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.