A reasonable jury could determine Costco’s use of the term “Tiffany” merely described a style of engagement ring and wouldn’t likely confuse consumers, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said.
A Manhattan federal court improperly ruled at the summary judgment stage, despite open questions that should have gone to trial, that Costco purposely misled customers into believing rings it sold were Tiffany engagement rings, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.