The drug maker’s complaint plausibly alleged that Eli Lilly knew of the patents, knowingly induced infringing acts by others, and acted with a specific intent to induce infringement, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts said. It adequately put Eli Lilly on notice of the claims, the court said.
The case involves two method patents for using Teva’s Ajovy to treat refractory migraines—a type ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.