The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in August 2019 that Hospira’s and DRL’s New Drug Applications infringed Lilly’s patent on its cancer drug Alimta under the doctrine of equivalents. The doctrine imposes liability for equivalents to patented technology that don’t literally infringe a patent’s claims.
Hospira and DLR argued that Lilly’s doctrine-of-equivalents claims were barred by prosecution history estoppel because Lilly based its infringement allegations on patent claims that it lost ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.