A doorbell camera company’s trade-secrets lawsuit against its former partner, home security firm Alarm.com Inc., withstood a bid to throw out the case for being filed too late.
An agreement between the company meant Alarm.com may have had a license to use the asserted intellectual property at the time it started selling the relevant smart-doorbell product, Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. said in an opinion Wednesday, rejecting the company’s motion to dismiss SkyBell Technologies Inc.'s July 2025 lawsuit. That could mean the alleged theft didn’t occur until the license expired, he wrote.
Alston noted in a footnote that SkyBell said ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.