A contract between Sarepta and Nippon Shinyaku clearly required that, for a certain period of time, Sarepta could only dispute the validity of Nippon Shinyaku’s patents in Delaware federal court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said.
Sarepta’s decision to challenge Nippon Shinyaku’s patents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board during that time “contravened the plain language of the forum selection clause” in the agreement, the appeals court ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.