The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled in November that Radwell infringed Rockwell’s trademarks by reselling Rockwell-branded products without permission and in a “materially different” form because they lacked Rockwell’s warranty, quality control, or customer support guarantee. Rockwell also won on false advertising, tortious interference, and other claims.
The parties were headed for a trial to determine damages for Radwell’s infringement and false advertising, and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.