A writer failed to revive his lawsuit before the Ninth Circuit claiming
Joe Carlini failed to allege the 2019 film copied protectable elements from “What the F is He Thinking,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said. The works differ widely, and most similarities flow naturally from the unpredictable idea of a character becoming able to hear others’ private thoughts or the romantic comedy genre, the court said.
Concepts that flow naturally from genres and unprotected ideas can’t support a ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.