The Patent Trial and Appeal Board decided numerous claims in Quest’s U.S. Patent No. 8,409,862 are invalid because they’re either obvious or anticipated. The board relied on an abstract that is part of a compact disc from a 2001 American Society for Mass Spectrometry conference.
Quest argued there were hundreds of abstracts on the CD and this particular one couldn’t be easily found. Accordingly, Quest said the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.