Substantial evidence supports jurors’ findings in their “carefully considered” May 17 verdict that Tagrisso infringes US Patent Nos. 10,603,314 and 10,596,162 and that the patents aren’t invalid, as well as the damages award, according to Wyeth’s opposition brief filed June 28 in the US District Court for the District of Delaware. AstraZeneca filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
