Th US Patent and Trademark Office urged the Federal Circuit to reject an appeal from
A California federal judge correctly concluded that PTO precedent known as the Fintiv rule is a “general statement of policy” not subject to public notice-and-comment, the agency argued in a brief filed Wednesday. Fintiv doesn’t qualify as a substantive rule requiring pubic feedback because its factors don’t alter legal rights or obligations, nor do they bind private parties with the force and effect of ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.