Applicants challenging an examiner’s decision not to grant a patent need to prove that evidence wasn’t easily accessible to save their invention, under a precedential Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling.
In designating the decision, Ex parte Grillo-López, as precedential, the Patent and Trademark Office tribunal clarified that an earlier precedent on evidence requirements in certain administrative patent challenges doesn’t apply to patent examination proceedings.
Under the new precedential decision, the burden is on the applicant to prove evidence wasn’t publicly available. By contrast, challengers trying to kill existing patents in inter partes reviews at the board must ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
