Overstock defeated the suit because Lexos already had a full and fair chance to litigate the issue of one patent’s validity, and therefore the doctrine of collateral estoppel applied to bar that claim, Judge Julie A. Robinson of the US District Court for the District of Kansas said Monday.
Robinson also found Lexos’ expert offered inadmissible testimony, leaving no evidence of infringement, and that Lexos’ infringement theory was inconsistent ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.