The artificial intelligence company informed Magistrate Judge Wang of its decision at status conference this week in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, according to a letter filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. OpenAI has drawn lawsuits accusing it of violating copyright law in the process of training its large language models, including suits brought by
OpenAI doesn’t intend to ask for a stay of the cases while its request is pending with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and will continue to participate in scheduled discovery, according to the letter.
Late last month, Intercept Media Inc.'s claim that OpenAI intentionally removed copyright management information from the news outlet’s work in violation of the DMCA survived a motion to dismiss in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Earlier in November, OpenAI defeated a similar suit from Raw Story Media Inc. and Alternet Media Inc. in the same court.
The company previously moved to merge lawsuits filed by The New York Times and Daily News LP. The New York Times and OpenAI declined to comment.
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Latham & Watkins LLP, and Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP represent OpenAI. Joseph Saveri Law Firm LLP and Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP represent the authors.
The case is Tremblay v. OpenAI Inc., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-03223, letter filed 12/5/24.
(Updates to add no-comment in penultimate paragraph. An earlier version of this story erred in naming Boise Schiller as plaintiffs' counsel after the firm claimed in an email to Bloomberg Law to be part of the team.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.