The jury also found that Norton’s infringement was intentional, meaning the judge may increase the award by up to three times the jury’s amount, according to the verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Of the total award, $91.1 million was a royalty for Norton’s sales to U.S. customers. The jury awarded a royalty of $94 ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.