The jury also found that Norton’s infringement was intentional, meaning the judge may increase the award by up to three times the jury’s amount, according to the verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Of the total award, $91.1 million was a royalty for Norton’s sales to U.S. customers. The jury awarded a royalty of $94 ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.