Archegos wasn’t an insider of the public companies in which those investors held shares, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said Tuesday. Thus the firm didn’t owe the companies a fiduciary duty, and the banks aren’t liable under an insider trading theory of as the firm’s “tippees.”.
The investors’ misappropriation theory fell short because as brokers dealing “at arms length,” banks didn’t owe fiduciary duties to Archegos, Judge
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.