Neither
Although they were both “close calls,” Stone didn’t prove it was entitled to summary judgment on its trademark infringement claims, and Miller didn’t prove it had priority to the mark, the Southern District of California said in an opinion entered Monday.
Miller started emphasizing the word “Stone” in advertising and packaging for its Keystone beers in 2017. Stone argues the rebranding effort infringed its trademarks and negatively affected ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.