The precedential opinion is the latest in a series of cases in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is outlining the contours of what it means for a case to be “exceptional,” thus allowing the winning side to collect attorneys’ fees under the Patent Act. The U.S. Supreme Court held in 2014’s Octane Fitness v. ICON Health & Fitness that an “exceptional” case is one that stands out ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.