Ross, along with its supplier IOPA Inc., which does business as Impulse Off Price Apparel, infringed and counterfeited Lululemon’s trademarks and violated unfair competition laws, the Canadian company says in its suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Lululemon, which describes itself as “a leading designer and retailer of high-quality, yoga-inspired athletic apparel,” allegedly bought 20 counterfeit products with its trademarks at two California DD’s stores in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
