Five patents on smart TV technology were properly invalidated based on
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed TVnGO Ltd.'s infringement claims, finding relevant parts of the patents indefinite.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in a nonprecedential opinion, agreeing that inconsistencies among the patents create “confusion as to which reading is correct.” A patent must be precise enough to give clear notice of what it describes so the public knows what is still open to them, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
