Case law supports Meta’s argument that copying made in the course of creating new knowledge is transformative, four law professors wrote in a proposed amicus brief filed Monday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.
“Rejecting existing precedent about the fairness of intermediate uses—internal copying designed to produce a noninfringing output—would be harmful to the copyright system as a whole, which is designed to ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.