The U.S. Supreme Court grappled with whether federal courts could review Patent and Trademark Office decisions to review a patent’s validity when the agency determined that the time bar didn’t apply.
Justice Elena Kagan said that allowing courts to second-guess the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s choice to institute trial could allow the agency and parties to go through administrative proceedings “soup to nuts,” only to have a court throw out the entire process over a missed deadline to challenge “what we know by now is an invalid patent.”
The Dec. 9 arguments in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
