The US Supreme Court won’t address the standards to register trademarks consisting of generic, foreign words as it declined to take up the case of a Swiss clothier whose name means “clothes” in French.
Vetements Group AG’s petition told the high court US trademark law’s “doctrine of foreign equivalents” often nullifies legitimate rights to distinctive marks. Automatically denying protection if a brand’s translation is perceived as generic by less than 1% of US consumers opens the door to counterfeiters, Vetements argued.
The company applied for several trademarks on “Vetements” and “Vetements Haute Couture” in 2020. Some covering non-clothing merchandise were ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.