A tribunal upheld the validity of four patents covering facial recognition authentication systems that a suite of Jumio Corp. products are accused of infringing.
Jumio failed to demonstrate FaceTec Inc.'s US Patent Nos. 10,776,471; 11,157,606; 11,693,938; and 11,874,910 are obvious in light of previous patent applications and one issued patent, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board said in decisions unsealed Wednesday.
Administrative Patent Judge Garth D. Baer dissented from all four decisions, saying prior art cited by Jumio renders parts of the patents invalid as obvious.
In 2024, FaceTec sued Jumio in the US District Court for ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.