The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected arguments from Mylan critiquing a district court’s ruling that its generic treatment and associated labeling didn’t sufficiently differentiate its product from the Janssen patent. The court also disagreed with the generic-maker’s argument that Janssen’s US Patent No. 10,143,693 was obvious and therefore invalid, according to the opinion written by Judge Sharon Prost and issued by the court Friday. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.