Judge Martha M. Pacold of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Tuesday granted HP’s motion to dismiss without prejudice, saying the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits attempts to monopolize.
The plaintiff’s tying claims, in which the company allegedly conditioned the purchase of HP printers to HP-branded ink, were also dismissed.
Consumers last year accused HP of creating a monopoly through ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.