The US Supreme Court’s decision reining in the global reach of US trademark law left practitioners questioning brand owners’ ability to combat foreign parties indirectly selling knock-offs into the country.
While nixing a $90 million award based mostly on foreign infringement, the high court ruled that whether plaintiffs can obtain damages turns on whether the “use in commerce” that could confuse consumers was domestic—defined by the infringer’s conduct, not the consumer confusion itself.
Four justices concurred with Justice
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.