The US Supreme Court declined to take up
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in October ordered Crocs to face USA Dawgs Inc.'s claims it fooled consumers and gained market share in violation of a false-advertising statute by describing Croslite foam as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive,” when the material wasn’t covered by a patent and was used by others in the industry.
In its petition, Crocs said the Federal Circuit erred in extending the Lanham Act’s prohibition ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.