A district court was right to dismiss an infringement suit against
Even under a narrower characterization of US Patent No. 7,679,637 proposed by the plaintiff company, “we would still conclude the claims are directed to the patent-ineligible abstract idea of allowing asynchronous review of presentations, rather than any specific technological improvement,” because the claims don’t explain how the solution is actually achieved, wrote Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore in a precedential opinion issued ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.