Claims from two of Impact Engine Inc.'s patents—US Patent Nos. 7,870,497 and 10,565,618— covered “the abstract idea of processing information—turning user-provided input into user-tailored output—and not any improved concrete tools or methods by which that processing functionality is achieved,” wrote Judge Richard G. Taranto of US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in an opinion issued Wednesday.
Those claims don’t clear the bar for patent eligibility, he ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.