The Federal Circuit revived a lawsuit accusing
A three-judge panel disagreed with a federal judge in Houston who’d determined the late-added arguments were harmless error, saying they were “not satisfied that the verdict was uninfected by Phillips’ improper and prejudicial noninfringement theory,” according to a precedential opinion issued Monday by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The panel remanded the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.