The owner, founder, and operator of the famed Los Angeles eatery Dan Tana’s , failed to establish a likelihood of confusion in a trademark infringement case against similarly-named restaurants in Atlanta, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled July 15 (Tana v. Dantanna’s).
Affirming a lower court’s grant of summary judgment against the Hollywood restaurateur, the court further dashed any hopes the common-law trademark holder may have had to use the name by expansion into other markets, absent a cancellation of the Atlanta restaurant name at the Patent and Trademark Office.
Dan Tana’s Trademark Registration ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.