The US District Court for the Southern District of Texas declined to stay the lawsuit while the US Patent and Trademark Office reviews Ensign’s challenge to C-MOR Energy’s US Patent No. 10,976,016 because there is no legal barrier preventing Ensign from resuming allegedly infringing activity and no guarantee that a validity ruling would simplify the issues. The court also adopted C-MOR’s proposed interpretation of key patent terms over Ensign’s, according to an opinion issued ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.