Edible Arrangements LLC convinced the Eleventh Circuit to revive its claims that 1-800-Flowers.com Inc. infringed its trademarks by purchasing them as keyword search terms.
A lower court erroneously found Edible Arrangements’ claims barred by a settlement covering similar conduct, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled Friday, finding the agreement couldn’t have addressed actions 1-800-Flowers took after the pact. The panel reversed the lower court’s summary judgment ruling and remanded the case.
The unsigned opinion explicitly declined to address whether a company infringes by buying a rival’s trademark as a keyword so users searching for the rival ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.