The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that Munchkin Inc. didn’t infringe based on its interpretation of the patent language.
But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a precedential opinion disagreed with the lower court’s interpretation of one patent and found it improperly applied claim vitiation to bar doctrine of equivalents liability for the other.
The doctrine of equivalents imposes liability for technology that doesn’t literally ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
