E.l.f. Cosmetics Inc. convinced a California federal judge that its Lash ‘N Roll mascara doesn’t infringe the trademarks and trade dress of Benefit Cosmetics LLC’s “holy grail” Roller Lash mascara.
Though e.l.f.'s product is a “dupe” of Roller Lash, Benefit failed to show Lash ‘N Roll actually dupes any consumers, Judge Richard Seeborg wrote in an opinion published Tuesday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The decision comes after a six-day bench trial in August and closing arguments in October.
Benefit, a unit of
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.