Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. may proceed with its state law claims that
The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejected the drug companies’ arguments that the suit should be dismissed as barred by earlier litigation over ownership of the patents or preempted by federal law.
The lawsuit is related to an earlier case where the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit found Dana-Farber researchers were properly added as co-inventors on six patents owned by Ono and licensed to BMS.
Dana-Farber sued the drugmakers ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.