Costco Wholesale Corp. acted in bad faith when it used the word “Tiffany” to describe a particular ring setting, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled Sept. 8 (Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., S.D.N.Y., 1:13-cv-01041, 9/8/15).
Costco said that its Tiffany Setting rings—engagement rings with a solitaire diamond set with six prongs—were named for a generic type of ring within the jewelry industry. But the court held that “Tiffany” is not a generic term for a particular ring setting.
The court determined infringement by asking whether Costco’s use of Tiffany’s registered ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.