Cisco initiated the lawsuit against Dexon in 2020 for trademark infringement and counterfeiting, but Dexon replied with its own claims that Cisco engaged in false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act.
Judge Charles R. Breyer of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California granted Cisco’s motion to dismiss the counterclaims, but gave Dexon one last chance to amend.
In its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.