The District of New Jersey denied Amazing Lash Studio Inc. and Amazing Lash Cafe LLC’s motion to dismiss Amazing Lash Franchise LLC’s trademark infringement action. The court found that Amazing Lash Studio’s motion was deficient, and that the certification submitted improperly contained arguments of the facts and law. And the court found that Amazing Lash Franchise plausibly stated a claim for relief on the grounds that the studio used its mark to compete directly in the eyelash extension services market.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.