A federal district court in California held that Cribl Inc.’s reverse engineering of Splunk Inc.’s copyright protected software in order to develop its own interoperable software constituted fair use under the Copyright Act. The court found that Cribl copied the Splunk software for the purpose of learning how to write its own code that would be able to send data from Cribl to Splunk. According to the court, this use was transformative, and the underlying commercial purpose for Cribl’s actions wasn’t to compete directly with Splunk.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.