The maker of a self-massage tool marketed to rock climbers didn’t infringe a California-based rival’s patented massager design, the Federal Circuit said.
The case pitting patent owner Range of Motion Products LLC against Armaid Co. split a panel of appellate judges over the test the court uses for determining whether a product is substantially similar to—and therefore infringes—a patented design. At issue was when a design combines features that are purely ornamental with others that have at least some functionality that falls outside of what is protected by a design patent.
RoM argued on appeal that a district court judge ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.