A California federal judge erred in concluding a US Patent and Trademark Office precedent known as the Fintiv rule is a “general statement of policy” not subject to public notice-and-comment, the companies argued in an opening brief filed Monday. Fintiv qualifies as a substantive rule requiring pubic feedback because it deprives parties of opportunities to cancel questionable patents and restricts the discretion of tribunal judges, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.