A California federal judge erred in concluding a US Patent and Trademark Office precedent known as the Fintiv rule is a “general statement of policy” not subject to public notice-and-comment, the companies argued in an opening brief filed Monday. Fintiv qualifies as a substantive rule requiring pubic feedback because it deprives parties of opportunities to cancel questionable patents and restricts the discretion of tribunal judges, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.