- Case Summary:
A district court granted a photographer’s copyright infringement summary judgment motion against an artist who took his photographs to make art works. The court rejected the artist’s claim of fair use. - Key Takeaway:
An artist’s use of a photographer’s “highly original” works was not fair use as it was only minimally transformative, substantially commercial, substantially greater than necessary, and it unfairly damaged the original market for the photos.
An artist’s use of a photographer’s works in a book about Rastafarians was not a transformative fair use, and was thus infringing, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.