- Closely held
TriMed agreed during a March 9 teleconference that under the court’s “proposed revised construction” of language in the asserted patent, TriMed “did not present evidence at trial to satisfy its burden of proof on infringement,” according to anopinion issued Monday in federal court in Wilmington- Arthrex agreed during the March 9 teleconference that, if the court were to revise its interpretation of the patent’s language and a finding ...
- Arthrex agreed during the March 9 teleconference that, if the court were to revise its interpretation of the patent’s language and a finding ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.